- Genre
- Documentary
- Year
- 2015
- Runtime
- 1h21
0
Thought Crimes
When thoughts collide with the law: fantasy, evidence, and consequence.
Watch Thought Crimes streaming in the
No offers found.
We couldn't find any offers for Thought Crimes streaming in the UAE.
Synopsis
Thought Crimes (2015), directed by Erin Lee Carr and featuring commentator Violet Blue, is a tense documentary that probes the controversial criminal case of Gilberto Valle, the so-called "Cannibal Cop." Combining courtroom footage, interviews, and archival materials, the film explores where private fantasy ends and criminal intent begins. It examines law enforcement tactics, prosecutorial choices, and the wider legal and ethical questions around policing speech and online fantasy. Through intimate interviews with those close to the case and expert voices, Thought Crimes raises uncomfortable questions about privacy, free expression, and how technology shapes modern investigations — all while keeping the viewer focused on the human consequences of a landmark legal battle. The film is meticulous in presenting evidence and argument without revealing the case’s outcome in ways that spoil the viewing experience.
Cast
Reviews
Critical response to Thought Crimes has been largely positive, with many reviewers praising its timely examination of speech, fantasy, and criminal culpability. On Rotten Tomatoes the film holds an 89% approval rating, reflecting widespread critical approval for its probing approach and the ethical questions it raises; the Rotten Tomatoes consensus describes the film as "a gripping, thought-provoking documentary" that forces viewers to confront difficult legal and moral lines. IMDb users give the film a 6.3/10, indicating a more mixed but still generally favorable audience reaction.
Positive notices highlight Erin Lee Carr’s adept direction and the film’s careful assembly of interviews, courtroom material, and archival sources. Critics commended the documentary for resisting simplistic judgments and for foregrounding the human impact of prosecutorial decisions. Many reviewers singled out the film’s ability to provoke debate about how the criminal justice system interprets intent in an era of online communication.
At the same time, some critics noted limitations: a few reviews argued the film occasionally flirts with sensationalism given the lurid subject matter, or that it could have dug deeper into the psychological motivations behind online fantasy. Others wished for more legal context in parts of the documentary to help less-informed viewers fully grasp the stakes of certain courtroom choices. Overall, consensus reviews balance praise for its nuance and relevance with cautious critiques about depth in specific areas. The combined reaction positions Thought Crimes as a compelling, conversation-starting documentary that many critics consider essential viewing for anyone interested in law, technology, and the boundaries of thought and action.
