Pete Doherty in 24 Hours streaming
Genre
Documentary
Year
2009
Runtime
0h42

0

Metascore

Pete Doherty in 24 Hours

One day with a rock icon — raw, real, unforgettable.

Watch Pete Doherty in 24 Hours streaming in

No offers found.
We couldn't find any offers for Pete Doherty in 24 Hours streaming in Cyprus.

Synopsis

Pete Doherty in 24 Hours is a 2009 documentary that offers an intimate glimpse into the life of British musician Pete Doherty, known for his role as the frontman of The Libertines and Babyshambles. Over the course of a single day, the film captures Doherty's raw and unfiltered experiences, highlighting both his artistic process and personal struggles. Through candid footage, viewers witness the complexities of his character—his creative genius intertwined with moments of vulnerability and controversy. This portrayal challenges the typical celebrity documentary by focusing on a compressed timeline, allowing audiences to connect deeply with Doherty's personality and day-to-day reality.

Reviews

Critical reception of Pete Doherty in 24 Hours has been mixed, reflecting the polarizing nature of its subject. On IMDb, the film holds a modest rating, around 5.5 out of 10, with viewers appreciating the candid access but noting a lack of narrative depth. Reviewers from music-centric platforms, like NME, praised the documentary for its authentic portrayal and rare behind-the-scenes content, describing it as "a compelling snapshot of a troubled artist". However, critics from mainstream outlets expressed concerns over the film's narrow focus and minimal contextual background, with some stating it "fails to offer sufficient insight beyond Doherty’s persona". Rotten Tomatoes does not have an aggregate score due to limited reviews, but available critiques tend to highlight the film's appeal primarily to existing fans rather than a general audience. Metacritic has no score for this title, indicating it received limited critical attention. Overall, the documentary is recognized for its rawness and honesty but critiqued for uneven pacing and lack of broader exploration of Doherty’s life and impact.