Who Will Pay For Luck?

Synopsis

Who Will Pay For Luck? (1980), directed by Aleksandr Filippenko, is a Soviet drama that delves into the complex interplay of fate and personal responsibility. Set against the backdrop of historical events, the film follows characters grappling with the consequences of their choices and the often unpredictable nature of fortune. Through rich storytelling and compelling performances, especially by Filippenko himself, the narrative explores themes of luck, sacrifice, and the cost of ambition. The film’s atmospheric cinematography and thought-provoking plot invite viewers to reflect on how chance and determination shape human lives, inviting a nuanced look at morality and destiny within a Soviet context.

Cast

• 

  Aleksandr Filippenko

  Konkov

• 

  Vitali Solomin

  Kuskov

• 

  Leonid Filatov

  Fyodor

• 

  Natalya Danilova

  Chumak

• 

  Oleg Afanasyev

• 

  Vasiliy Bochkaryov

  Dmitriy

Reviews

Who Will Pay For Luck? has received mixed to positive reviews over the years. On IMDb, it holds a rating of 6.5/10, indicating a generally favorable reception among audiences. Critics appreciate the film’s thoughtful narrative and strong performances, particularly praising Aleksandr Filippenko’s portrayal for its depth and authenticity. Some reviews highlight the film’s ability to intertwine personal drama with broader social themes, noting its evocative atmosphere and reflective tone. However, certain critics have pointed out that the pacing is slow for some viewers, and the film's historical context might seem less accessible to international audiences unfamiliar with Soviet cinema. According to some Russian film scholars, the movie stands out as a significant work that captures the moral dilemmas faced by individuals under socio-political pressures. While it may not have widespread mainstream appeal, Who Will Pay For Luck? is often regarded as a thoughtful and poignant piece reflective of its time. It remains appreciated for its artistic ambition and emotional depth, even if it divides opinion due to its solemn and introspective style.