The Stanford Prison Experiment

Synopsis

The Stanford Prison Experiment is a gripping psychological drama based on the real-life 1971 experiment conducted by psychologist Philip Zimbardo. Led by Zimbardo himself (portrayed by Billy Crudup), the study aimed to explore the psychological effects of perceived power by assigning college students to the roles of either prison guards or inmates in a simulated prison environment. As the days progress, the experiment spirals out of control, revealing the disturbing depth of human nature, authority, and obedience. With carefully crafted performances from an ensemble cast, including Ezra Miller and Tye Sheridan, the film delves into the moral implications of the experiment, showcasing how quickly ordinary people can succumb to oppressive dynamics. The film challenges viewers to reflect on the concepts of power and conformity, raising questions that remain relevant today.

Cast

• 

  Billy Crudup

  Dr. Philip Zimbardo

• 

  Michael Angarano

  Christopher Archer

• 

  Ezra Miller

  Daniel Culp / Prisoner 8612

• 

  Tye Sheridan

  Peter Mitchell / Prisoner 819

• 

  Olivia Thirlby

  Dr. Christina Maslach

• 

  Nelsan Ellis

  Jesse Fletcher

Reviews

The Stanford Prison Experiment has received a mix of praise and critical examination since its release. Rotten Tomatoes reports an impressive 84% freshness rating, indicating strong approval from critics. The film was lauded for its authentic representation of the experiment and thought-provoking themes. The Hollywood Reporter described it as 'a haunting portrayal of human behavior under the influence of authority,' emphasizing the disturbing realities of the social experiment. IMDb users rate it at 6.8/10, with viewers noting its engaging narrative and compelling performances, particularly highlighting Billy Crudup's portrayal of Zimbardo. 'The film elicits a powerful reflection on morality and ethics,' one user wrote. However, Metacritic’s score of 67/100 suggests that some found the film lacking in depth and complexity, with The New York Times mentioning it as 'a lesson in the fragility of ethics in the face of power.’ Audiences have found themselves engrossed and disturbed, illustrating the impact of a psychological experiment that continues to resonate.